Roulette & Visual Ballistics
Roulette is a game of chance, and ever since its creation people have been trying to analysis and develop a set system for winning at it. One way of beating roulette is visual ballistics which is where you visually determine where the ball is most likely to land on the wheel. It sounds like an unlikely proposition but it does actually work, albeit more than likely on older roulette wheels which are more likely to have flaws.
The idea of visual ballistics is that the gambler makes mental calculations which involve comparing the wheel rotation speed versus the velocity of the launch versus a reference point. This of course all sounds very well in theory but in reality it’s a completely different story – even counting how many times the wheel spins, whilst counting how many times the ball is spinning is rather difficult! Something that aids in the process of visual ballistics is a skill called rhythm counting, which is what was demonstrated by illusionist Derren Brown, whilst demonstrating how he was going to ‘beat a casino’. He tapped the wheel spins out with one foot and the ball spins out with the other. While we all know that Derren is a very talented man, this is indeed something that mere mortals will take quite a long time to master! In rhythm counting in roulette you are determining the wheel speed from how far the wheel moves over a set period of time equal to that of your repetitive count. Some people use special boxes with built in electronic that create a vibration rhythm in order to practice how to measure how far the wheel moves over a set time equal to that of the vibrations.
Roulette was originally developed in 1967 by the French mathematician Pascal Blaise, but he developed it not for its use in gambling but during an experimentation of perpetual motion devices. His invention pioneered the mathematical field of probability and it is probability which determines the pay-outs of all casinos. Due to the mathematical nature of roulette, it is theoretically impossible to ever achieve the absolute certainty of a win so there is always a risk factor – even if your visual ballistics is pretty perfect there is still the chance of losing, as Derren just recently discovered!
To learn how to apply visual ballistics to the game of roulette is something that takes serious strength of mind, and while there are quite a lot of flaws to the system, it is possible to perform and achieve big payouts with it.
Some people have stated that with online roulette there are no predictive characteristics, but this would be an inaccurate assumption – the virtual game has more signatures than the live game, so there is no reason not to get on board with online gambling. At the end of the day, it is wise to remember that unless you want to become a serious roulette professional you are better off not trying to beat the casino, but to look at roulette as the game of chance that it is and so many of us love.
How To Play Roulette
Roulette Sleeper System
Introducing The Game Of Roulette
Deal Or No Deal Jackpot Over £100,000
Macau Casinos Up 59%
“Roulette was originally developed in 1967 by the French mathematician Pascal Blaise”
check the date
I do not agree with what you had to say. First of all your take on how to use visual ballistics is incorrect. Secondly, you mention “flaws to the system” I am not quite sure what you mean by that.
Roulette is a negative expectancy game (which means that there is a house edge) In European roulette that house edge is 2,7%
There are only two methods to beat roulette in the longrun. That is VB and Bias analysis.
With VB I calculate where the ball will hit on the rotor and therefore if I account for scatter and bet say 5-9 numbers and I’m always in the correct area, if I get a 50% hit rate on only 5-9 numbers I have turned the house edge around into my favor. If however you were betting blindly (in other words with magical systems from guru system sellers and what not) you are open to the house edge. Let’s take an example. You bet only on Black which off course is 18 numbers, so you should have a 50% chance of winning right? Well obviously wrong. The zero has to be accounted for. So there are 37 numbers on a Euro wheel. The payout is 35 to 1. So hence the 2,7% house edge.
Now. You are betting blindly on 18 numbers So you are due to win 48.65% of spins (in the longrun) So for every 100 spins betting say $5 per number (18 x $5 = $90 per spin x 100 spins = $9000.00 spent. The house would of taken $243 of that. So you effectively have to win $9243 to break even……..
So there is no system based on past results or magical events that could ever give you an advantage over the house. You will loose. I could go on forever. Why doesn’t past results matter? Well every spin is a new event. That means that there is still 37 pockets that the ball can fall in next spin. Just like the previous spin and just like in 5 spins time. The wheel is totally random when it comes to system players. Gambler’s fallacy, what does it mean? Well in short it means you bet on something because you believe it’s due. Sleepers if you like. So I bet on dozen 3 because it hasn’t shown in 6 spins. Surely it must show within the next 3-4 spins. So I start betting dozen three with a progression. Sorry to say but that is GF. There is no reason why dozen 3 should show up next. Like earlier said, every spin is a new event. That means that on every spin D1/D2/D3 has even chances of coming up. Simple as that.
Lastly I see that the author says there is no reason why you should not play online and he specifies that RNG is more predictive than real roulette. This is absolutely utter nonsence and really angers me. Show me the person that is in profit after a year of playing RNG roulette (real money) and I show you a lier. Although it isn’t even necessary for online casinos to cheat because of the built in house edge, they still do. Why do you think that B&M casinos with real wheels have spreads like this min $5 – Max$100 on a number whereas some online casinos have spreads like this Min 10c – Max $200. Not only are they encouraging you to play progressive betting but they are assured that you will loose with crooked software. 99% of these programs have built in safe guards. So if it picks up that you are betting progressively and it goes to a large amount of money it will run your progression out. Leaving you in tatters.
For god sake RNG isn’t even roulette. There is no ball and no wheel. Only a real number generator which brings up numbers but note only after you have placed you bet… It’s like I ask you to put $5 down on the table and guess which number between 1 or 2 am I thinking of. You say 2.. I say sorry it was 1. Put another fiver down. What am I thinking off. You say 1… I say nope it was 2… and so on and so on. STAY AWAY FROM ONLINE CASINOS.
As a last note. Online casinos are devious bastards. When you join up first you are almost assured to win small but nevertheless win. Once they have hooked you it is goodnight nurse.
Stay away from online casinos.
VB
Thanks for your comment, you raise loads of interesting points. At the end of my article I do point out that Roulette is a game of chance (like most casino games) in the long run you’ll more than likely lose more than you win due to the casinos edge.
Various players have won using VB, but most successful players use gadgets such as smartphones to compute the options (this is illegal BTW).